Author summary
90% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karandeep Singh results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,901 hits . Analysis detected 15,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,556 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,830 of 8,795 authors). This Karandeep Singh is worse (more manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group. Karandeep Singh
Author details
Total words: 12,556
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.8% percentile 3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 15.1% 15.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 11.8% 11.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 15.1%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 11.8%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst