Author summary
21% 1 analyzed article/video 607 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kara Willis results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 279 hits . Analysis detected 983 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,062 of 8,797 authors). This Kara Willis is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. Kara Willis
Author details
Total words: 2,428
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.4% 10.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst