Author summary
68% 12 analyzed articles/videos 3,023 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kanako Takahara results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,284 hits . Analysis detected 10,796 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,664 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 53% (4,460 of 9,471 authors). This Kanako Takahara is worse (more manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group. Kanako Takahara
Author details
Total words: 12,664
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score12 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.6% 4.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst