Author summary
10%1 analyzed article/video1,201 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Pot results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 373 hits. Analysis detected 1,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 9% (8,045 of 8,799 authors). This Justin Pot is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group.
Justin Pot
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
9%Justin Pot (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,804
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

9% percentile
02550751008.6% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos