Author summary
95% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,216 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Hicks results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 1,995 hits . Analysis detected 8,119 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,992 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 68% (3,038 of 9,471 authors). This Justin Hicks is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group. Justin Hicks
Author details
Total words: 8,992
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.9% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.4% 17.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst