Author summary
93% 2 analyzed articles/videos 146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Choi results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 554 hits . Analysis detected 3,185 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,068 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 91% (866 of 8,953 authors). This Justin Choi is worse (more manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group. Justin Choi
Author details
Total words: 2,068
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.3% percentile 5.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 14.6% 14.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.7% 8.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.2% 11.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 26.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 9.4%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst