Author summary
45% 11 analyzed articles/videos 8,891 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julie Denesha results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 2,165 hits . Analysis detected 17,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,728 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 14% (7,542 of 8,737 authors). This Julie Denesha is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group. Julie Denesha
Author details
Total words: 32,728
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.7% percentile 1.3% BS Score10 analyzed articles32.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst