Author summary
90% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julie Bindel results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 1,466 hits . Analysis detected 12,153 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,312 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (2,736 of 9,471 authors). This Julie Bindel is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Julie Bindel
Author details
Total words: 9,312
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.1% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.7% 15.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.5% 13.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst