Author summary
⁠43%4 analyzed articles/videos1,096 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julianna Washburn results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Pessimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 396 hits. Analysis detected 2,758 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,052 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (7,199 of 9,327 authors). This Julianna Washburn is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Julianna Washburn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠23%Julianna Washburn (selected)2%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,052
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

23% percentile
025507510022.8% percentile
1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos