Author summary
44% 1 analyzed article/video 2,186 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julian Andreone results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Biased Writer Voice , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 741 hits . Analysis detected 4,937 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,744 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 23% (7,366 of 9,471 authors). This Julian Andreone is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Julian Andreone
Author details
Total words: 8,744
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.2% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst