Author summary
66% 1 analyzed article/video 1,292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Juan David Rojas results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 427 hits . Analysis detected 3,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 44% (4,801 of 8,575 authors). This Juan David Rojas is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Juan David Rojas
Author details
Total words: 5,168
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst