Author summary
18% 1 analyzed article/video 1,620 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Juahl Ganaway results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 510 hits . Analysis detected 2,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 28% (6,524 of 8,960 authors). This Juahl Ganaway is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group. Juahl Ganaway
Author details
Total words: 6,480
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 7.9% 7.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst