Author summary
89% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joshua A. Douglas results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Indoctrination , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 1,962 hits . Analysis detected 8,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,485 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (3,153 of 8,865 authors). This Joshua A. Douglas is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group. Joshua A. Douglas
Author details
Total words: 7,485
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 26.2% 26.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.1% 7.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.1%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst