Author summary
98% 12 analyzed articles/videos 5,705 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Koehn results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 9,168 hits . Analysis detected 51,093 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,418 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 64% (3,406 of 9,471 authors). This Josh Koehn is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. Josh Koehn
Author details
Total words: 35,418
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score12 analyzed articles35.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.1% 13.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 25.9% 25.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 25.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst