Author summary
78%6 analyzed articles/videos4,683 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph MacKinnon results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 2,599 hits. Analysis detected 20,507 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,470 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 46% (4,616 of 8,529 authors). This Joseph MacKinnon is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Joseph MacKinnon
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
46%Joseph MacKinnon (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 19,470
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

46% percentile
025507510045.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles19.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.6%12.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate