Author summary
39% 1 analyzed article/video 838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Dieleman results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Self-Serving Bias , and Indoctrination , with Straw Man as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 276 hits . Analysis detected 1,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 42% (5,372 of 9,125 authors). This Joseph Dieleman is better (less manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group. Joseph Dieleman
Author details
Total words: 3,352
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Straw Man: Author 8.2%, sitewide 0.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst