Author summary
65%3 analyzed articles/videos1,524 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Zavaleta results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 1,925 hits. Analysis detected 4,676 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,468 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 53% (4,326 of 9,186 authors). This Jonathan Zavaleta is worse (more manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group.
Jonathan Zavaleta
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
53%Jonathan Zavaleta (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,468
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

53% percentile
025507510052.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 25.8%25.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 25.8%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos