Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Shorman results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 907 hits. Analysis detected 6,931 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,400 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,557 of 9,226 authors). This Jonathan Shorman is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Jonathan Shorman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
51%Jonathan Shorman (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,400
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510050.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 6.2%6.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate