Author summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 1,054 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Liew results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.6% saturation with 1,331 hits . Analysis detected 4,909 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,762 of 8,958 authors). This Jonathan Liew is worse (more manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group. Jonathan Liew
Author details
Total words: 4,216
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.3% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 31.6% 31.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 7.5% 7.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst