Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Gibson results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 161 hits. Analysis detected 659 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (3,384 of 9,471 authors). This Jonathan Gibson is worse (more manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Jonathan Gibson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠65%Jonathan Gibson (selected)3%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,508
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

64% percentile
025507510064.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.8%3.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.7%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos