Author summary
51% 2 analyzed articles/videos 674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Bandler results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 268 hits . Analysis detected 1,576 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,696 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (2,441 of 8,795 authors). This Jonathan Bandler is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group. Jonathan Bandler
Author details
Total words: 2,696
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.3% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.7% 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 3.1% 3.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Special Pleading: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst