Author summary
51%2 analyzed articles/videos674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Bandler results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 268 hits. Analysis detected 1,576 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,696 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (2,441 of 8,795 authors). This Jonathan Bandler is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Jonathan Bandler
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
73%Jonathan Bandler (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,696
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

72% percentile
025507510072.3% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.9%9.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.7%2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.1%1.1%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Author 3.1%3.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.6%1.6%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Author 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Horn Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.0%Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate