Author summary
99% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Mac Ghlionn results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 1,552 hits . Analysis detected 12,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,028 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,570 of 9,471 authors). This John Mac Ghlionn is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group. John Mac Ghlionn
Author details
Total words: 7,028
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.4% percentile 4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 22.1% 22.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.2% 14.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.4% 17.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 12.1% 12.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.0% 16.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.2%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 22.1%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.6%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.1%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst