Author summary
14% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,019 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Mascia results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 331 hits . Analysis detected 4,000 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,873 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (8,214 of 8,801 authors). This Jennifer Mascia is better (less manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group. Jennifer Mascia
Author details
Total words: 10,873
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.7% percentile 1.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst