Author summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 2,842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Bannan results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,100 hits . Analysis detected 7,659 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 33% (6,239 of 9,287 authors). This Jennifer Bannan is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group. Jennifer Bannan
Author details
Total words: 11,368
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst