Author summary
68% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,246 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Somers results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 1,584 hits . Analysis detected 8,329 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,984 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,777 of 8,557 authors). This Jeff Somers is worse (more manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Jeff Somers
Author details
Total words: 8,984
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.6% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 17.2% 17.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.6% 17.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.6%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 17.2%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst