Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Jay Barmann results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Availability Heuristic , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 140 hits . Analysis detected 1,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,138 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 9,519 authors). This Jay Barmann is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Jay Barmann
Author details
Total words: 2,138
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.4% Primacy Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst