Author summary
58%1 analyzed article/video1,672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jamie Siebrase results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 1,075 hits. Analysis detected 3,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 29% (6,746 of 9,471 authors). This Jamie Siebrase is better (less manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Jamie Siebrase
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
29%Jamie Siebrase (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,688
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

29% percentile
025507510028.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 16.1%16.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.1%0.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Author 16.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos