Author summary
54%7 analyzed articles/videos5,367 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Roberts results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 6,005 hits. Analysis detected 16,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,728 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 29% (6,787 of 9,463 authors). This James Roberts is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
James Roberts
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
29%James Roberts (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 26,728
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

28% percentile
025507510028.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles26.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 22.5%22.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 22.5%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate