Author summary
84%1 analyzed article/video866 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Herchek results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 566 hits. Analysis detected 3,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,686 of 8,797 authors). This James Herchek is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
James Herchek
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
70%James Herchek (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,464
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

70% percentile
025507510069.5% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.3%16.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos