Author summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Hadfield results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 769 faulty-reasoning hits from 568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (604 of 9,471 authors). This James Hadfield is worse (more manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group.
James Hadfield
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠94%James Hadfield (selected)8%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 568
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

94% percentile
025507510093.6% percentile
7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles568 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 24.5%24.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 26.1%26.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.2%12.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 8.4%8.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hindsight Bias: Author 24.5%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Author 8.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Author 7.4%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos