Author summary
8%1 analyzed article/video671 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JAMES BROOKS results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 877 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 21% (7,389 of 9,332 authors). This JAMES BROOKS is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
JAMES BROOKS
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
21%JAMES BROOKS (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,684
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

21% percentile
025507510020.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.1%Personal Incredulity: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Middle Ground: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos