Author summary
8% 1 analyzed article/video 671 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JAMES BROOKS results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 119 hits . Analysis detected 877 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 21% (7,389 of 9,332 authors). This JAMES BROOKS is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group. JAMES BROOKS
Author details
Total words: 2,684
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.1% Personal Incredulity: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Middle Ground: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst