Author summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Hook results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 2,413 hits . Analysis detected 15,291 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,212 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 47% (4,677 of 8,706 authors). This Jake Hook is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group. Jake Hook
Author details
Total words: 16,212
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles16.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Loss Aversion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst