Author summary
24% 1 analyzed article/video 1,375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JACQUES BILLEAUD results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 424 hits . Analysis detected 2,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 38% (5,602 of 8,942 authors). This JACQUES BILLEAUD is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group. JACQUES BILLEAUD
Author details
Total words: 5,500
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst