Author summary
38% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,721 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Sanchez results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Anecdotal , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 1,183 hits . Analysis detected 3,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,884 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (6,494 of 9,471 authors). This Jacob Sanchez is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. Jacob Sanchez
Author details
Total words: 6,884
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 17.2% 17.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.0% 0.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 17.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst