Author summary
45% 1 analyzed article/video 1,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jackie Fortiér KFF Health News (TNS) results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Pessimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 435 hits . Analysis detected 2,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 42% (5,195 of 8,889 authors). This Jackie Fortiér KFF Health News (TNS) is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. Jackie Fortiér KFF Health News (TNS)
Author details
Total words: 4,800
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Red Herring: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst