Author summary
85% 2 analyzed articles/videos 432 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Crosbie results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 1,015 hits . Analysis detected 4,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,060 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 89% (1,089 of 9,483 authors). This Jack Crosbie is worse (more manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group. Jack Crosbie
Author details
Total words: 3,060
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.5% percentile 5.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 33.2% 33.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.8% 5.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 33.2%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.0%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Horn Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst