Author summary
38% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,353 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ira Winderman results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and False Dilemma , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 229 hits . Analysis detected 2,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,412 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 27% (6,965 of 9,443 authors). This Ira Winderman is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group. Ira Winderman
Author details
Total words: 5,412
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst