Author summary
23% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,083 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ila Bell results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 291 hits . Analysis detected 2,213 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,332 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 38% (5,923 of 9,486 authors). This Ila Bell is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group. Ila Bell
Author details
Total words: 4,332
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.7% 6.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst