Author summary
43%2 analyzed articles/videos3,577 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunter Pauli results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 1,322 hits. Analysis detected 7,398 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,842 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (5,545 of 8,546 authors). This Hunter Pauli is better (less manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
Hunter Pauli
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
36%Hunter Pauli (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,842
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

35% percentile
025507510035.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.2%11.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.0%Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate