Author summary
92%8 analyzed articles/videos5,655 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hugo Timms results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 5,552 hits. Analysis detected 32,651 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,210 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (3,321 of 8,821 authors). This Hugo Timms is worse (more manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Hugo Timms
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
63%Hugo Timms (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 23,210
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

62% percentile
025507510062.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles23.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 23.9%23.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.4%10.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate