Author summary
92% 8 analyzed articles/videos 5,655 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hugo Timms results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 5,552 hits . Analysis detected 32,651 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,210 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (3,321 of 8,821 authors). This Hugo Timms is worse (more manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group. Hugo Timms
Author details
Total words: 23,210
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles23.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.9% 23.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.7% 5.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst