Author summary
6% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,501 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Holly Ramer results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Status Quo Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 2.2% saturation with 121 hits . Analysis detected 1,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,383 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (8,765 of 8,940 authors). This Holly Ramer is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group. Holly Ramer
Author details
Total words: 5,383
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.0% percentile 0.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Red Herring: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.6% Special Pleading: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst