Author summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 629 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Henry J. Gomez results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 287 hits . Analysis detected 2,398 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,516 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (2,451 of 9,490 authors). This Henry J. Gomez is worse (more manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group. Henry J. Gomez
Author details
Total words: 2,516
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.2% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Straw Man: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst