Author summary
9% 1 analyzed article/video 602 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hayley Harding results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 105 hits . Analysis detected 928 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 33% (6,001 of 8,956 authors). This Hayley Harding is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Hayley Harding
Author details
Total words: 2,408
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Special Pleading: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst