Author summary
45% 1 analyzed article/video 999 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hamza Fahmy results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 228 hits . Analysis detected 2,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 26% (6,375 of 8,572 authors). This Hamza Fahmy is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group. Hamza Fahmy
Author details
Total words: 3,996
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst