Author summary
17% 1 analyzed article/video 737 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Guy Winch Ph.D. results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Overconfidence Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 166 hits . Analysis detected 1,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,948 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 59% (3,682 of 8,901 authors). This Guy Winch Ph.D. is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group. Guy Winch Ph.D.
Author details
Total words: 2,948
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.2% 5.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Middle Ground: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst