Author summary
37% 1 analyzed article/video 528 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Fox results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 203 hits . Analysis detected 1,308 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 62% (3,340 of 8,788 authors). This Greg Fox is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. Greg Fox
Author details
Total words: 2,112
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 7.6%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Tu Quoque: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst