Author summary
80% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grayson Logue results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 978 hits . Analysis detected 8,361 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,468 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (3,442 of 9,092 authors). This Grayson Logue is worse (more manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group. Grayson Logue
Author details
Total words: 7,468
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.6% 10.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.1% 13.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst