Author summary
17%2 analyzed articles/videos3,017 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gracie McKenzie results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 916 hits. Analysis detected 5,179 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,068 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 13% (7,773 of 8,870 authors). This Gracie McKenzie is better (less manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group.
Gracie McKenzie
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
13%Gracie McKenzie (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,068
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

12% percentile
025507510012.4% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos