Author summary
48% 1 analyzed article/video 818 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grace Mayer results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 327 hits . Analysis detected 1,862 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (5,461 of 9,471 authors). This Grace Mayer is better (less manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group. Grace Mayer
Author details
Total words: 3,272
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst