Author summary
51%3 analyzed articles/videos2,018 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glenn Puit results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 456 hits. Analysis detected 6,093 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,640 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 34% (5,633 of 8,524 authors). This Glenn Puit is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Glenn Puit
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
34%Glenn Puit (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,640
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

34% percentile
025507510033.9% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate